![]() ![]() ![]() If you want to read in great detail what Microsoft have changed when moving from IE9 to IE10+, this should provide you with exactly what you require. I’m not going to be held responsible for any production-level disasters you may cause through lack of due diligence! I’ve provided configurations for the various methods I used for testing, but please edit these carefully – they are specifically designed for my lab, so you will need to pay attention when setting them up for your own environments. However, I am hoping that this can provide some pointers on what to expect, in order to save others from the rollercoaster that I seem to have experienced! In fact, the reports I am getting from others in the field suggest that you may see markedly different behaviour dependent on the nature of your web applications and users. This is only based on testing in my lab on a limited set of parameters, so I’m not expecting these to be absolutely indicative of what you may observe in your own environments. Part 3 will extend the tests onto some more UEM tech (actual vendors to be confirmed).įirst of all, let’s get a disclaimer in. Part 2 will spread out further and perform testing on some of the “lite” UEM technologies to see how they measure up to this infuriating task (UPM and UE-V). Part 1 will cover the background and my initial tests using traditional methods vs. This article is going to be divided into three parts. So, I thought it would be prudent to share my findings with all and sundry, just to give you a heads-up on what potentially awaits. It’s been a frustrating voyage of discovery, punctuated with epiphanies, server rebuilds and quite a few journeys straight back to the drawing board. I’ve spent weeks looking at the issue of Cookies and History persistence now, since I was alerted to the possible issues in the first place. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |